Looked at this following the API owners meeting and given that the usecounters <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4193560> landed in 112, I think we can expect stable data early April but not before.
Joey - does that match your understanding? On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 1:04 AM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 5:07 PM Simon Pieters <zcor...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> Hi folks! >> >> Thanks for working on this, Joey. Removing quirks where possible is >> always nice! >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:18 PM Joey Arhar <jar...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Sounds good, I'm adding a UseCounter here: >>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4193560 >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 8:05 AM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Joey, >>>> Thanks for working to remove a quirk! Although we haven't written it >>>> into our compat principles <http://bit.ly/blink-compat>, I'm >>>> personally willing to accept greater compat risk for removing quirks as >>>> they're by-definition legacy behavior of the web which create an ongoing >>>> complexity burden for the platform which we should seek to eventually >>>> eliminate. >>>> >>>> Reading through the history >>>> <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2988#issuecomment-1271763702> >>>> of WebKit not being able to make this change due to severe breakage in >>>> bugzilla and seeing that we still load 12% of pages in quirks mode >>>> <https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/2034>, >>>> >>> >> In https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2020/markup#conclusion the number >> was 3.97% of *pages* in httparchive are in quirks mode, and if I remember >> correctly, this has further declined slightly in 2021 and 2022. I'm not >> sure why there's a 3x discrepancy between the use counter page view number >> and the httparchive pages number, though. Does an about:blank iframe >> trigger the use counter? >> > > Wow, that is surprising to me! Typically the biggest discrepancy comes > from the fact that usage is head-heavy with 1/3rd of page loads being > from the top 100 origins > <https://twitter.com/RickByers/status/1195342331588706306>, and I would > absolutely expect the head to not be using quirks mode. Perhaps there's one > or two popular sites using quirks mode? No, only http/https schemes > contribute to UseCounters IIRC so about:blank shouldn't be the problem. Or > maybe there's some discrepancy in how we're identifying quirky pages. > > cheers, >> -- >> Simon Pieters >> https://www.mozilla.com/ >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY8ZizCwMOX_r8dKbJ44xNkih7J4Tx7z31DNnPOrmLRH%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY8ZizCwMOX_r8dKbJ44xNkih7J4Tx7z31DNnPOrmLRH%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfW6HPEiVjNBJHf5yNu6QhaXoJeNiQuhwo0MmRhr0orc4Q%40mail.gmail.com.
