Yes, that matches my understanding. I can see on omahaproxy that the usecounter was merged in 112 and I can see on chromiumdash that 112 goes to stable on april 4
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:11 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > Looked at this following the API owners meeting and given that the > usecounters > <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4193560> landed > in 112, I think we can expect stable data early April but not before. > > Joey - does that match your understanding? > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 1:04 AM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 5:07 PM Simon Pieters <zcor...@mozilla.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks! >>> >>> Thanks for working on this, Joey. Removing quirks where possible is >>> always nice! >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:18 PM Joey Arhar <jar...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Sounds good, I'm adding a UseCounter here: >>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4193560 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 8:05 AM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Joey, >>>>> Thanks for working to remove a quirk! Although we haven't written it >>>>> into our compat principles <http://bit.ly/blink-compat>, I'm >>>>> personally willing to accept greater compat risk for removing quirks as >>>>> they're by-definition legacy behavior of the web which create an ongoing >>>>> complexity burden for the platform which we should seek to eventually >>>>> eliminate. >>>>> >>>>> Reading through the history >>>>> <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2988#issuecomment-1271763702> >>>>> of WebKit not being able to make this change due to severe breakage in >>>>> bugzilla and seeing that we still load 12% of pages in quirks mode >>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/2034>, >>>>> >>>> >>> In https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2020/markup#conclusion the number >>> was 3.97% of *pages* in httparchive are in quirks mode, and if I remember >>> correctly, this has further declined slightly in 2021 and 2022. I'm not >>> sure why there's a 3x discrepancy between the use counter page view number >>> and the httparchive pages number, though. Does an about:blank iframe >>> trigger the use counter? >>> >> >> Wow, that is surprising to me! Typically the biggest discrepancy comes >> from the fact that usage is head-heavy with 1/3rd of page loads being >> from the top 100 origins >> <https://twitter.com/RickByers/status/1195342331588706306>, and I would >> absolutely expect the head to not be using quirks mode. Perhaps there's one >> or two popular sites using quirks mode? No, only http/https schemes >> contribute to UseCounters IIRC so about:blank shouldn't be the problem. Or >> maybe there's some discrepancy in how we're identifying quirky pages. >> >> cheers, >>> -- >>> Simon Pieters >>> https://www.mozilla.com/ >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "blink-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY8ZizCwMOX_r8dKbJ44xNkih7J4Tx7z31DNnPOrmLRH%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY8ZizCwMOX_r8dKbJ44xNkih7J4Tx7z31DNnPOrmLRH%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAK6btwJD-xHCX7EuOP%3DO22yXuiHE-fFc%3D35V5Yg5UdsDhKV3%2BA%40mail.gmail.com.
