Removing appearance keywords which have no painting code might have
compatibility issues. We removed the keyword "caret" in the past, and it
caused issues like crbug.com/944023.

The counter for this is
https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4416. The
value is 0.005 - 0.02.

I recommend having a deprecation period before removal.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:54 AM Di Zhang <dizha...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#appearance-switching
>
> Summary
>
> Since only standard appearance keywords should be supported, we are
> removing the appearance (and -webkit-appearance) keywords that shouldn't be
> supported anymore: * inner-spin-button * media-slider * media-sliderthumb *
> media-volume-slider * media-volume-sliderthumb * push-button *
> searchfield-cancel-button * slider-horizontal * sliderthumb-horizontal *
> sliderthumb-vertical * square-button Note that value "slider-vertical" will
> not be removed as part of this patch it is used for allowing <input
> type=range> vertical. It will be removed once feature
> FormControlsVerticalWritingModeSupport is enabled in stable. Previously, if
> using any of the above keywords, a console warning will be shown, but the
> keyword will be recognized as a valid value. With the feature enabled,
> there will be no console warning. The appearance property will be ignored
> and set to the empty string. The use count (under
> WebFeature::kCSSValueAppearanceNonStandard) is at 0.005985% as of July 2023
> [3]. [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#appearance-switching [2]
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8506#issuecomment-1515062326
> [3]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTP-wXiSV9_dSbbs4OEH-XqP0hakmoTwmEBkEJ-EAI3vDmlXxWMdHvCYl01QqUHm7q6iw8ubK0d3xk1/pub
>
>
> Blink componentBlink>CSS
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>
> TAG reviewNone
>
> TAG review statusNot applicable
>
> Risks
>
>
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
> This feature only affects the reflection in computed style. Currently,
> while it is possible to set an appearance value with one of these
> non-standard values, it will not affect the appearance of that element.
> Now, if appearance is set to one of these non-standard values, the returned
> computed appearance value will be auto. It is unlikely websites depend on
> this information: this deprecation should be web compatible.
>
>
> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping
>
> *WebKit*: No signal
>
> *Web developers*: No signals
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> Ergonomics
>
> There are no other platform APIS this will be used in tandem with and this
> will not make it hard for chrome to maintain good performance.
>
>
> Activation
>
> There should be no challenge for developers to take advantage of this
> feature immediately.
>
>
> Security
>
> N/A
>
>
> WebView application risks
>
> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>
> None
>
>
> Debuggability
>
> The non-standard appearance values we are removing are already not listed
> in the autocomplete in DevTools.
>
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?Yes
>
> Flag name on chrome://flagsRemoveNonStandardAppearanceValue
>
> Finch feature name
>
> Non-finch justificationNone
>
> Requires code in //chrome?False
>
> Tracking bughttps://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=924486
>
> Estimated milestones
> Shipping on desktop 117
> DevTrial on desktop 115
> Shipping on Android 117
> DevTrial on Android 115
> Shipping on WebView 117
>
> Anticipated spec changes
>
> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
> None
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5066630972833792
>
> Links to previous Intent discussions
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BSS7eAE3At9QiJ-XymVFxUc7Z2%2B06xGTBOk%2B%3D7sGGNHvt5HSg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BSS7eAE3At9QiJ-XymVFxUc7Z2%2B06xGTBOk%2B%3D7sGGNHvt5HSg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
TAMURA Kent
Software Engineer, Google

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGH7WqGmooLg362nFsWDC7JaYt3RaztUfccdtT5%2BA4_QFNJWJA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to