Thanks for the feedback. The counter does feel high, I will follow the 
Deprecation steps [1] and extend the milestones (likely DevTrial 117 and 
Shipping 3 milestones later at 120).

[1] 
https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/deprecation/README.md

On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 11:29:06 PM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote:

> Thanks!! So IIUC, any usage will result in rendering changes? If that's 
> indeed the case, I think it makes sense to try and drive usage down before 
> changing behavior.. 
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:08 AM TAMURA, Kent <tk...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Valid appearance keywords have some side-effects even though they have no 
>> special painting.
>>  * Skip border painting
>>  * 'display' property value is changed to 'inline-block' or 'block'.  So 
>> some properties such as 'width' 'height' are not ignored.
>>
>> <p>
>> <span style="border:2px solid red; height:3em; background:yellow; 
>> appearance:media-slider;">Valid</span>
>> <span style="border:2px solid red; height:3em; background:yellow; 
>> appearance:foobar;">Invalid</span>
>> </p>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 5:00 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> tkent@ - can you expand on the compat risk? It's not immediately obvious 
>>> to me what these apps were doing that resulted in a rendering difference.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023, 03:45 TAMURA, Kent <tk...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Removing appearance keywords which have no painting code might have 
>>>> compatibility issues. We removed the keyword "caret" in the past, and it 
>>>> caused issues like crbug.com/944023.
>>>>
>>>> The counter for this is 
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4416. The 
>>>> value is 0.005 - 0.02.
>>>>
>>>> I recommend having a deprecation period before removal.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:54 AM Di Zhang <dizha...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org
>>>>>
>>>>> ExplainerNone
>>>>>
>>>>> Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#appearance-switching
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> Since only standard appearance keywords should be supported, we are 
>>>>> removing the appearance (and -webkit-appearance) keywords that shouldn't 
>>>>> be 
>>>>> supported anymore: * inner-spin-button * media-slider * media-sliderthumb 
>>>>> * 
>>>>> media-volume-slider * media-volume-sliderthumb * push-button * 
>>>>> searchfield-cancel-button * slider-horizontal * sliderthumb-horizontal * 
>>>>> sliderthumb-vertical * square-button Note that value "slider-vertical" 
>>>>> will 
>>>>> not be removed as part of this patch it is used for allowing <input 
>>>>> type=range> vertical. It will be removed once feature 
>>>>> FormControlsVerticalWritingModeSupport is enabled in stable. Previously, 
>>>>> if 
>>>>> using any of the above keywords, a console warning will be shown, but the 
>>>>> keyword will be recognized as a valid value. With the feature enabled, 
>>>>> there will be no console warning. The appearance property will be ignored 
>>>>> and set to the empty string. The use count (under 
>>>>> WebFeature::kCSSValueAppearanceNonStandard) is at 0.005985% as of July 
>>>>> 2023 
>>>>> [3]. [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#appearance-switching [2] 
>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8506#issuecomment-1515062326 
>>>>> [3] 
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTP-wXiSV9_dSbbs4OEH-XqP0hakmoTwmEBkEJ-EAI3vDmlXxWMdHvCYl01QqUHm7q6iw8ubK0d3xk1/pub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink componentBlink>CSS 
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG reviewNone
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature only affects the reflection in computed style. Currently, 
>>>>> while it is possible to set an appearance value with one of these 
>>>>> non-standard values, it will not affect the appearance of that element. 
>>>>> Now, if appearance is set to one of these non-standard values, the 
>>>>> returned 
>>>>> computed appearance value will be auto. It is unlikely websites depend on 
>>>>> this information: this deprecation should be web compatible.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ergonomics
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no other platform APIS this will be used in tandem with and 
>>>>> this will not make it hard for chrome to maintain good performance.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Activation
>>>>>
>>>>> There should be no challenge for developers to take advantage of this 
>>>>> feature immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Security
>>>>>
>>>>> N/A
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>> The non-standard appearance values we are removing are already not 
>>>>> listed in the autocomplete in DevTools.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flagsRemoveNonStandardAppearanceValue
>>>>>
>>>>> Finch feature name
>>>>>
>>>>> Non-finch justificationNone
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=924486
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 117
>>>>> DevTrial on desktop 115
>>>>> Shipping on Android 117
>>>>> DevTrial on Android 115
>>>>> Shipping on WebView 117
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>> issues 
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5066630972833792
>>>>>
>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BSS7eAE3At9QiJ-XymVFxUc7Z2%2B06xGTBOk%2B%3D7sGGNHvt5HSg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BSS7eAE3At9QiJ-XymVFxUc7Z2%2B06xGTBOk%2B%3D7sGGNHvt5HSg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> TAMURA Kent 
>>>> Software Engineer, Google 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGH7WqGmooLg362nFsWDC7JaYt3RaztUfccdtT5%2BA4_QFNJWJA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGH7WqGmooLg362nFsWDC7JaYt3RaztUfccdtT5%2BA4_QFNJWJA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> TAMURA Kent 
>> Software Engineer, Google 
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/c221c72e-e8ea-4581-b906-c8cc163be7afn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to