Just to clarify, I've made the change in the deviceId verbiage in the spec, 
not pointerId :)

On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 8:40:00 PM UTC-8 Sahir Vellani wrote:

> I can't say what the reasoning is for that behavior in 
> PointerEvent.pointerId, as I was not involved. However, I will make a 
> change in the spec to only use the value of 1 for primary mouse device.
> There may be a scenario where PointerEvent.deviceId is unsupported by the 
> UA (separate from an invalid id of -1); e.g, on platforms where the feature 
> is unimplemented. In that case, developers might have a check like 
> if(event.deviceId) {...}. If the deviceId is 0 for a valid reason, it will 
> fail that check. I see no harm in limiting the deviceId from primary mouse 
> to 1. It will avoid this interop issue and make the feature more friendly 
> to web developers.
>
> On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 6:26:20 PM UTC-8 mike...@chromium.org 
> wrote:
>
>> Forgive my ignorance around this API generally, but is there any reason 
>> the spec can't require a single value? If not, why not?
>> On 1/18/24 3:05 PM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote:
>>
>> Appreciate the feedback! Yes the PR was reviewed by WG members for any 
>> major concerns; but I believe there will be more comprehensive feedback 
>> once the Level 3 spec lands. Regarding your concern, the language is based 
>> on that of PointerEvent.pointerId. The ultimate goal here is to 
>> differentiate between devices, and like pointerId, the way the ids are 
>> assigned has been left to the UA. I think web developers should be able to 
>> rely on PointerEvent.pointerType to confirm whether the pointer event comes 
>> from the primary mouse device. In Chromium, we transmit 1 for the mouse for 
>> PointerEvent.deviceId.
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 7:39:48 AM UTC-8 yoav...@chromium.org 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 3:51:59 PM UTC+1 vmp...@google.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 6:08 PM 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev <
>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, good news! 
>>>
>>> Reviving this thread because we have accomplished:
>>> 1. TAG Review Completion:  Extending the PointerEvent with Unique 
>>> DeviceId Attribute · Issue #880 · w3ctag/design-reviews (github.com) 
>>> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/880> Resolution: 
>>> Satisfied
>>> 2. WICG Repository for standardization discussions. Link to explainer in 
>>> WICG Repo:  pointer-event-extensions/pointer-event-device-id-explainer.md 
>>> at main · WICG/pointer-event-extensions (github.com) 
>>> <https://github.com/WICG/pointer-event-extensions/blob/main/pointer-event-device-id-explainer.md>
>>> 3. A PR against the PointerEvent spec with proposed changes:  Add 
>>> deviceId to PointerEvent spec by sahirv · Pull Request #495 · 
>>> w3c/pointerevents (github.com) 
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/pull/495/files> We will be 
>>> waiting for Spec Level 3 to come out before this can be merged; but this 
>>> provides an official starting point for the standardized description of 
>>> this feature. Based on the feedback received, I don't anticipate any major 
>>> changes to the design.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the PR! Was it reviewed by other WG members?
>>> For example, "User agents MAY reserve a generic `deviceId` value of `0` 
>>> or `1` for events generated by the primary mouse device." seems risky from 
>>> an interop perspective. E.g. developers may rely on some UAs doing that and 
>>> fail when others don't.
>>>
>>>
>>> For posterity, I was initially unsure why this wasn't an issue on the 
>>> w3c/pointerevents, but it does seem like the discussion happened there and 
>>> folks agreed to move this in WICG: https://github.com/w3c/
>>> pointerevents/issues/353 \o/
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewers, can we please get another review for shipping this feature?
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 8:55:43 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree that this needs a spec PR and the explainer should at least 
>>> migrate to WICG before we agree to ship. Also, can you please link to the 
>>> TAG review? 
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 4:16:41 AM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:42 AM Mike Taylor <mike...@chromium.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> LGTM1
>>> On 10/15/23 11:07 AM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't aware they were mandatory. The steps 
>>> have been started, just awaiting feedback from Security and Privacy 
>>> reviewers. I've received LGTMs for all other areas. After our response to 
>>> WebKit's question, they did not have any further follow-up questions. So 
>>> I'm assuming all is well.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:59:15 AM UTC-7 Daniel Bratell wrote:
>>>
>>> I see that various mandatory steps in chromestatus 
>>> (privacy,security,enterprise,debuggability,testing) seems to be 
>>> unstarted. It is possible they were made mandatory after you create the 
>>> entry, but it would be good if you could get them started now at least.
>>>
>>> Also, it's unfortunate that TAG and standards positions requests have 
>>> not resulted in anything, but that is hardly your fault. There were some 
>>> questions in the WebKit request. Is all that ok now?
>>>
>>> /Daniel
>>> On 2023-10-06 20:10, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 9:03:35 AM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/4/23 7:43 PM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>
>>> Contact emails 
>>> gerc...@microsoft.com, sahir....@microsoft.com
>>>
>>> Explainer 
>>> https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/
>>> PointerEventDeviceId/explainer.md
>>>
>>> Specification 
>>> https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/
>>> PointerEventDeviceId/explainer.md
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a more formal spec for this?
>>> Any support outside of Microsoft that would enable y'all to move this to 
>>> the WICG?
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Summary 
>>>
>>> As devices with advanced pen input capabilities are becoming 
>>> increasingly prevalent, it is important that the web platform continues to 
>>> evolve to fully support these advanced features in order to unlock rich 
>>> experiences for both end users and developers. One such advancement is the 
>>> ability for a device's digitizer to recognize more than one pen device 
>>> interacting with it simultaneously. This feature is an extension to the 
>>> PointerEvent interface to include a new attribute, deviceId, that 
>>> represents a session-persistent, document isolated, unique identifier that 
>>> a developer can reliably use to identify individual pens interacting with 
>>> the page.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink component 
>>> Blink>Input 
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EInput>
>>>
>>> TAG review 
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/880
>>>
>>> TAG review status 
>>> Pending. TAG review has been pending for 2 months.
>>>
>>> Risks 
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: No signal (https://github.com/mozilla/
>>> standards-positions/issues/715)
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/
>>> standards-positions/issues/102)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> WebView application risks 
>>>
>>> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability 
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? 
>>> No
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ? 
>>> No. However, there are web tests in Chromium that test PointerEventInit 
>>> with this feature.
>>>
>>> Flag name on chrome://flags 
>>> PointerEventDeviceId
>>>
>>> Finch feature name 
>>>
>>>
>>> Non-finch justification 
>>> Edge origin trials successfully underway.
>>>
>>> Any Origin Trial feedback you can share?
>>>
>>>
>>> Absolutely, the feature has been working well. Our partners (Microsoft 
>>> Whiteboard) have enabled the feature that is dependent on this API for 
>>> their general audience! We did not receive any constructive feedback. This 
>>> API is being used by them on Microsoft Surface Hub devices, which support 
>>> multi-pen inking.
>>>
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome? 
>>> False
>>>
>>> Measurement 
>>> PointerEventDeviceId use counter implemented.
>>>
>>> Availability expectation 
>>> Initially available on Chromium browsers on Windows.
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity, are there limitations on other platforms that prevent 
>>> supporting this feature?
>>>
>>>
>>> We haven't been able to get our hands on hardware that supports other 
>>> platforms in addition to multi pen inking in order to implement and 
>>> appropriately test this feature. We welcome any sponsors for implementing 
>>> and testing this, especially on Linux/Android.
>>>
>>>
>>> Adoption expectation 
>>> Feature is used by specific partner(s) to provide functionality 
>>> immediately upon launch.
>>>
>>> Adoption plan 
>>> This feature has been through origin trials on Edge. It is being used by 
>>> partners that provide features on devices with multi pen support.
>>>
>>> Non-OSS dependencies 
>>>
>>> *Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open 
>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?*
>>> Operating system API's are used to obtain the device id, and are 
>>> necessary for this feature to function. Please see the security 
>>> questionnaire in the TAG review on security and privacy concerns related to 
>>> the use of these APIs.
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones 
>>> Shipping on desktop
>>> 120
>>>
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>
>>> *Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).*
>>> WICG Proposal: https://github.com/WICG/proposals/issues/101 No web 
>>> compat/interop risk.
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5114132234240000
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussions 
>>> Intent to prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/
>>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/SA0PR00MB1033E5DE0BDE42239E647
>>> E9AFB189%40SA0PR00MB1033.namprd00.prod.outlook.com
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/PH0PR00MB1349B7917876E7AC505E7
>>> 90AFBCBA%40PH0PR00MB1349.namprd00.prod.outlook.com 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/PH0PR00MB1349B7917876E7AC505E790AFBCBA%40PH0PR00MB1349.namprd00.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/c8f16bc4-8d21-450b-9178-
>>> 964cba818a68n%40chromium.org 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/c8f16bc4-8d21-450b-9178-964cba818a68n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>
>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/8077a67d-4104-48c6-9f9b-
>>> 09f9e6c8b022n%40chromium.org 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/8077a67d-4104-48c6-9f9b-09f9e6c8b022n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/13bad65e-6276-4567-b6e3-
>>> 0961e44bc6d1%40chromium.org 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/13bad65e-6276-4567-b6e3-0961e44bc6d1%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/cbc6e96b-0165-4e28-8f16-
>>> 786f0dea7ac8n%40chromium.org 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/cbc6e96b-0165-4e28-8f16-786f0dea7ac8n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6afb2718-89f6-47d5-9052-d5ab2a8f849dn%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6afb2718-89f6-47d5-9052-d5ab2a8f849dn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ad471c41-673e-48f7-ac64-b00511b5d167n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to