On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 04:04 PM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>
> >On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> >
> > > At 10:50 AM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >[...] if a certain friend of mine
> > > >had gotten pregnant (and she was doing everything she could to prevent
> > > >it)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Why do I get the impression that "everything she could do" did not
> > > include celibacy?
> > >
> > >
> > > Just Wondering Maru
> >
> >Actually, it did at that time. That, *plus* birth control pills.
> >
> >But there was always the possibility of rape, which she was paranoid about
> >at the time. Something about having been molested by someone she trusted
> >fairly recently at that time. And she was concerned enough about it to
> >talk to me about it all.
>
>
>
> Umm . . . I was being a smart aleck, expecting the answer to be that she
> was already married at the time. I did briefly consider the possibility
> that she was single and paranoid about rape, but not in the sense that she
> had any special _reason_ to be paranoid. My problem is that I don't
> usually think of such things: I know that they happen, but they're just
> not something that comes to mind first. Or even second.
At the time that it was at all *my* problem for me to be taking any
action, she was married, but her husband was overseas in the military.
So, you were right about assuming she was married, but at that particular
time, she wasn't having consentual sex.
> >A couple of years later, the problem had corrected itself, and she has
> >a daughter now.
>
>
> That is great!
She's a neat little kid. :)
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
