"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 07:21 PM 8/8/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 02:51 PM 8/8/04, William T Goodall wrote:
> > >
> > > >On 8 Aug 2004, at 8:31 pm, Dan M. wrote:
> > > >>I went to the web site, and I am embarassed as a Catholic by the lack of
> > > >>consistant logic.
> > > >
> > > >LOL. I'm surprised you're surprised. The only logical outcome of thinking
> > > >about religion is atheism
> > >
> > > Not necessarily. Is the logical outcome of thinking about geometry
> > > Euclidean or non-Euclidean geometry?
> >
> >Yes.
> >
> >And both sorts of non-Euclidean.
>
> ;-)
>
> I recognized that it is not a perfect analogy. But then, analogies seldom
> are perfect.
Nor are questions. Yours wasn't absolutely clear as to what you were
asking. :) I think you were looking for a choice to be made, while I
was pointing out the options covered the bases.
(Dan's not here right now, and I've got to get the geek humor out of my
system *somehow*.)
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
