"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 07:21 PM 8/8/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 02:51 PM 8/8/04, William T Goodall wrote:
> > >
> > > >On 8 Aug 2004, at 8:31 pm, Dan M. wrote:
> > > >>I went to the web site, and I am embarassed as a Catholic by the lack of
> > > >>consistant logic.
> > > >
> > > >LOL. I'm surprised you're surprised. The only logical outcome of thinking
> > > >about religion is atheism
> > >
> > > Not necessarily. Is the logical outcome of thinking about geometry
> > > Euclidean or non-Euclidean geometry?
> >
> >Yes.
> >
> >And both sorts of non-Euclidean.
>
> ;-)
>
> I recognized that it is not a perfect analogy. But then, analogies seldom
> are perfect.
Nor are questions. Yours wasn't absolutely clear as to what you were asking. :) I think you were looking for a choice to be made, while I was pointing out the options covered the bases.
I think I made it clear in an later post than the one to which you were initially replying.
(Dan's not here right now, and I've got to get the geek humor out of my system *somehow*.)
As do we all. The results are nasty when it builds up inside until it explodes. Go right ahead.
-- Ronn! :)
"Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot remain in the cradle forever." -- Konstantin E. Tsiolkovskiy
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
