Wayne wrote: > > Seems to me, he is just pointing out the irony in the fact that the Green > Movement is a product of affluence which is a product of technology. And > more specifically that the Green movement is antipathetic to the > technology > that has given them the time and resources to become environmentally > aware. > > Am I right? > > But that's a false dichotomy. We've become environmentally aware because > the technology is what fouls the environment. The first time I flew into LA > in 1970 there was a thick, foul, yellow-brown haze that enveloped the city. > Did they figure out that millions of cars spewing lead tainted toxins was at > the root of the problem because they had "the time and the resources"? >
> Are we then saying saying that dark complected people that don't speak > English very well are too stupid to understand why the food tastes funny and > makes you sick when you shit in the river upstream of where you draw your > cook-water? > Doug Common Sense Maru _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
