On 23/09/2009, at 2:37 AM, Pat Mathews wrote:
We started with a plea for civility and niceness. Because it invoked
religion and the name of Jesus, the thread was promptly taken over
by those who felt it their bounden duty to object to the Christian
content - not on the grunds that they were not Christian, but
because they consider it their bounden duty to attack Christianity
whenever and wherever they see it, apparently, as evil,
superstitious, and whatever else they object to.
This is not civil
Um. No, ascribing false motive to others and lumping all "objecters"
together is not civil.
Arguing whether something is effective because it invokes "What would
Jesus do?" is not the same as attacking Christianity.
Charlie.
_______________________________________________
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
