Hello, On Thursday 18 March 2004 04:03, J. Antas wrote: > > I would strongly suggest an already widely used naming convention. That > would mean something like: fossfa-0.1
Ok, I agree. > A final word: why name it fossfa? > Is this branch something paid by FOSSFA? Is it officially sponsored by > FOSSFA? Should the Care2x project bother with it? fossfa is also an open-source initiative. Personally, I dont see any problem with it. But you can discuss it with Kurt. He and his organization (fossfa) will be the ones doing the work anyway, so I see it only fair to give them the credits. > It would be more meaningful to name it after that branch initiator and > main developer, in this case Kurt Brauchli (kurt-0.1). > Better yet, as Kurt said that it will include country (regional) > specific code, we could prefix it with the ISO 2 letter code of the > country for which it is being adapted. > In that case, while developing Denmark specific code, Kurt would add to > the [dkkurt-0.1] CVS branch, and if he ever started to develop USA > specific code he would add to a CVS branch named [uskurt-0.1]. You can discuss it with Kurt. Regards, elpidio ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
