thanks;
 i tryed it and it show in the running as 255.

regards

Suliman 
--- Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ebgp-multihop with no number afterwards will assume
> 255 (the maximum value).
> 
> If the peer is in the same AS that would be an iBGP
> connection, and the
> ebgp-multihop command would actually accomplish
> nothing.
> 
> HTH,
> 
>  
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
> Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>  
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Suliman Al-Mazroua
> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 12:50 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 38
> 
> hi Scott;
> 
> in lab 38; for r5 bgp peer group ebgp-multihop was
> used without any value
> after it;
> 
> 1- do we need ebgp-multihop where all the neighbours
> are in the same AS.
> 2- if we did not specify the value what would be the
> default behavour.
> 
> 
> regards and happy new year
> 
> Suliman 
> 
> --- Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > There ya go!
> > 
> >  
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
> > Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Gavin Lawson
> > Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 10:04 PM
> > To: Gavin Lawson; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 19 -
> Infrastructure Configuration
> > 
> > I found it.
> > 
> > port-channel load-balance dst-mac
> > 
> > GL
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Gavin Lawson
> > Sent: Sunday, 31 December 2006 11:38 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 19 - Infrastructure
> Configuration
> > 
> > Re - make sure the EtherChannel favours where
> frames are heading.
> > 
> > The proctor guide states that "Typically the
> channel-group forwards 
> > frames based on the source address for
> load-balancing"
> > 
> > Is there a command to use to make the switches
> calculate whitch link 
> > to use based on destination address?
> > 
> > GL
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to