I believe you may be mistaken. I don't believe there is any requirement to configure FRTS on the interface to use CBWFQ under a map-class.
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote: > guys either my understanding is wrong ..or could be task. > > i hope you all understood my query . > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> i am in VOL 2 LAB 15 . below is the task. >> >> configure CBWFQ on R5 interface S0/1/0.2 and PVC between R5 and R6 . >> The following packets routerd to MPLS core must be allocated a bandwidth . >> >> IPP 5 should be allocated 30 % of bandwidth >> IPP 4 should be allocated 20 % of bandwidth >> >> Ensure the policy map is applied to pvc and not to subinterface. >> >> >> Question : in soluiton we have CBWFQ policy map applied under a map-class >> for that pvc . >> >> however we know that when enabling CBWFQ on a pvc we MUST have FRTS >> enabled first . their is no FRTS in solution . >> >> from cco : >> Configure a service-policy within a Frame Relay map-class and enable >> per-VC queueing with the *frame-relay traffic-shaping* command. You can >> apply the map-class to the VC. >> >> >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a008009489a.shtml >> >> >> Any ideas guys ? >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
