Interesting thread. In the CCIE R+S Cert Guide they briefly mention that an
alternative to FRTS using frame-relay traffic shaping command, is to use
MQC. Doesn't go into any more detail than that, I guess further reading via
the cisco site is required.

Bal

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Rob Pool <[email protected]> wrote:

> No problem. That seems like a fair statement.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Imran Ali <[email protected]>
> To: Rob Pool <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 6:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] wrong solution ??
>
>
>
> thanks for doc,
>
> i guess you call this kind of frts  as MQC FRTS .
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Rob Pool <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That's a pretty old document that covers old hardware platforms. I'd refer
> you to the doc cd 12.4T ios. I've included an excerpt.
> >
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/wan/configuration/guide/wan_mqc_fr_tfshp_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1056693
> >
> >Configuring Class-Based Weighted Fair Queueing Example
> >The following example provides a sample configuration for CBWFQ with FRTS:
> >class-map voice
> >match ip dscp ef
> >policy-map llq
> >class voice
> >priority 32
> >policy-map shape-policy-map
> >class class-default
> >shape average 64000
> >shape adaptive 32000
> >service-policy llq
> >map-class frame-relay shape-map-class
> > service-policy output shape-policy-map
> >interface serial 0/0
> >encapsulation frame-relay
> >interface serial 0/0.1 point-to-point
> >ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> >frame-relay interface-dlci 100
> >class shape-map-class
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> > From: Imran Ali <[email protected]>
> >To: Rob Pool <[email protected]>
> >Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 6:07 PM
> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] wrong solution ??
> >
> >
> >
> >Cisco 7500 Series
> >Cisco 7200, 2600/3600 Series, and Other Platforms
> >Main Interface Configure a service policy on the main interface Supported
> only if Frame Relay TS is not enabled and the queueing mechanisms
> apply to a single interface pipe.
> >Subinterface Configure a servicepolicy on the subinterface. Configure a
> service policy within a Frame Relay map-class and enable per-VC
> queueing with the frame-relay traffic-shaping command. You can apply the
> map-class to the subinterface.
> >VC Level  Configure a service-policy within a Frame Relay map-class and
> enable per-VC
> queueing with the frame-relay traffic-shaping command. You can apply the
> map-class to the VC.
> >
> >
> >w.r.t  VC Level .. it does requires FRTS  . check the link in previous
> mail.
> >
> >i guess ONLY under main interface we can apply CBWFQ . But not on a PVC
> or a sub-interface.
> >
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Rob Pool <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >I believe you may be mistaken. I don't believe there is any requirement
> to configure FRTS on the interface to use CBWFQ under a map-class.
> >>
> >>Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>
> >>On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> guys either my understanding is wrong ..or could be task.
> >>>
> >>> i hope you all understood my query .
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> i am in VOL 2 LAB 15 . below is the task.
> >>>>
> >>>> configure CBWFQ on R5   interface S0/1/0.2  and PVC between R5 and R6
> .
> >>>> The following packets routerd to MPLS core must be allocated a
> bandwidth .
> >>>>
> >>>> IPP 5  should be allocated 30 % of bandwidth
> >>>> IPP 4  should be allocated 20 % of bandwidth
> >>>>
> >>>> Ensure the policy map is applied to pvc and not to subinterface.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Question :  in soluiton we have CBWFQ policy map applied under a
> map-class
> >>>> for that pvc .
> >>>>
> >>>> however we know that  when enabling CBWFQ on a pvc we MUST have FRTS
> >>>> enabled first . their is no FRTS in solution .
> >>>>
> >>>> from cco :
> >>>> Configure a service-policy within a Frame Relay map-class and enable
> >>>> per-VC queueing with the *frame-relay traffic-shaping* command. You
> can
> >>
> >>>> apply the map-class to the VC.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a008009489a.shtml
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Any ideas guys ?
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>
> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>>
> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to