Gah! I took another crack at it again based on your rant. Yup. Didn't get it
to work. Thought I had it until I changed the amount of content to force the
container object.
No surprise, really. But you know how you get on a roll and you're thinking,
"I've got it!," and then you really, really don't have it? It's like that.
CSS is like a pet gone rabid. You remember all the good times, but then it
bites you.
-Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Davis"
> They tend not to degrade well, almost all of them require 10 times more
code
> than a simple table layout and all of them have limitations (no borders,
> fixed column sizes, etc) Lastly even if you do get something working you
> have viewport issues (since CSS defines parent containers only as the
> visible portion in the viewport).
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- RE: Coudl it be that humans simply cannot program? Philip Arnold
- Re: Coudl it be that humans simply cannot program? Howie Hamlin
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Kevin Graeme
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Irvin Gomez
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Kevin Graeme
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Jim Davis
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Jim Davis
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Michael Haggerty
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Jim Davis
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Michael Haggerty
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Kevin Graeme
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Sandy Clark
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Michael Haggerty
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Maureen
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Jim Davis
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! William H Bowen
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Irvin Gomez
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Jim Davis
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Irvin Gomez
- RE: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Sandy Clark
- Re: Damn CSS... Damn it to hell! Irvin Gomez