of the UN, so what is the difference about France?
As far as I am concerned if it was vetoed, I would not have gone in
unilaterally., that's all.
----- Original Message -----
From: G
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Kerry would of gone to Iraq too?
Kerry would have you believe that without UN approval, he would then of not
attacked Iraq.
Which some may say is great....but there might be a scary precedence
here....France dictates our military????
*shudder*
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Morris
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: Kerry would of gone to Iraq too?
There couldn't have been a UN approval because France
promised to veto it. It's funny how France is also the
country making the most from the oil-for-food scandal.
So you hate Bush so much for taking us to this war but
now Kerry said he would have done the same. The
difference being he would have had a better exit
strategy. We don't know what it is but we know it
would've been better
-sm
<snip>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
