lol.
No problem with this logic, now explained. But this probably doesn't have
anything to do with the specific manpower question on Iraq and more to do with
overall approach to the military. Bush's team brought a new perspective that
Shineski didn't agree with and at his age decided he didn't care to stick
around (or it was recommended that he either climb aboard or grab another
train). My dad was military, so I know how this works.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Andy wrote:
> I am totally confused by your logic.
Heh, who isn't?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Bush's telling Non Answer. Angel Stewart
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. G
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Deanna Schneider
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. G
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Gruss Gott
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Larry C. Lyons
- RE: Bush's telling Non Answer. Andy Ousterhout
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Gruss Gott
- RE: Bush's telling Non Answer. Andy Ousterhout
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Gruss Gott
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Andy Ousterhout
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Gruss Gott
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Sam Morris
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. dana tierney
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Gruss Gott
- RE: Bush's telling Non Answer. Andy Ousterhout
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Sam Morris
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. dana tierney
- Re: Bush's telling Non Answer. Ray Champagne
- Re: Tax and Spend Liberal dana tierney