Problem with that model is that it favours the rich and well off while
penalizing the poor and lower middle classes to a disproportionate
amount.

Which I guess is OK if you can afford it. And as for those poor, well
they deserve it.

larry

On 7/7/05, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tariff based trade, with a minimalist government would work.  Levy tariffs
> against imports and exports, change all roads to toll roads.  Switch to a
> 'service based' model, where you pay for what you use.
> 
> By minimalist government you have to realize that I mean like 80% of our
> government just gone.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 11:06 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: GitMo (Was: speaking of)
> 
> 
> What government model would support that? Laws, by their very intent,
> are a limitation of freedoms in order to create order and the process
> of governing those laws needs to be funded somehow. Whether the money
> flows directly or indirectly, there are costs to everything.
> 
> The key is finding a balance.
> 
> On 7/7/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When will there be a party that favors leaving both our money and our
> > freedoms alone?
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Now there’s a better way to fax. eFax makes it possible to use your existing 
email account to send and receive faxes. Try eFax free.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=63

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:163383
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to