cant we all just puff, be peaceful, and eradicate fucknuts like this? :) la la la la la.... off into the forest i go...
la lal alalalalal On 4/18/07, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some regulation is needed. I agree with some regulation. I draw the line at > registration of all firearms. However, all firearms should be available for > purchase. Note I say firearms, not weapons systems. > > I want a Galil sniper rifle. It is a sexy beast that would be nice ti fire > on a long rifle range. I also miss my Colt .45. It can't be resored, so I > am having it melted down. I might buy a new one, more likely I'll get a > Glock now. > > I would also like a GE minigun for those days I have to brave New Orleans > traffic. That is a weapons system, so it should be restricted from sale to > the public. > > >(1.) Guns don't kill people, people kill people. > >If this is true then I should be able to buy any weapon in > >manufacture: Stinger Missiles, a fully armed F-22, an Abrams tank. If > >we agree the open sale of these weapons is a bad idea, then we must > >also agree that weapons do play a role in public safety and therefore > >should be regulated; the only question is degree of regulation. > > We need to protect ourselves period! The government won't. If a platoon of > marines wants my property, a few will be joining me in Valhala before they > take it, even if I have to use my teeth. I firearm isn't the only acceptable > self defense weapon. > > >(2.) We need to protect ourselves from the gov't. > >I got news for ya - your little 9mm pop gun ain't gonna do much when a > >platoon of Marines decides they're confiscating your house. You want > >gov't protection then you need the training and weapons the gov't has > >or let's eliminate this argument. > > However, if you start to throw out one of the "Bil of Rights" what is to > prevent us throwing out the First Amendment or the Third or another. > > >(3.) The Constitution says we can have guns. > >The Constitution also says we can change it at any time. > > Restrict sale of firearms and ammunition to adults, keep a three day waiting > period, require trigger locks on all handguns, stop the cross border weapons > trade from Mexico and require conceal carry permits of all handgun owners > with a semiannual training/live fire certification requirement. > > >So, if agree that *some* form of weapons regulation is needed, what > >and how? I think that something around the regulation of the > >manufacture of weapon and ammunition is the way to go. > > Now you're dreaming. I could drive to Saltillo tomorrow and drive back with > as many firearms as I could conceal in my truck. I could also load up on as > much ammo as I needed. > > Strict enforcement of current laws is what is needed, not new regulations. > > >E.g., Ban the sale of all handguns and ammunition for them in their > >current form. Create a new class of legal handguns and ammunition, > >"12 mm", that would have 3 shot clips, biometric trigger controls, > >etc. Something that would limit the killing power of the weapon in > >the case of VT. At the same time, legalize conceal-n-carry country > >wide. > > Absolutely. That is why I think concealed carry should be required when you > purchaser a handgun, even if you don't use it. > > >Criminals should know that if they point a gun at someone, there'll be > >20 guns points back at them. > > You can toss your share of BS too. I can also. > > >Those are just a few thoughts and ideas, but I'd favor real debate on > >the issue over the BS that is tossed around now. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:232808 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
