I love you too.

Seriously tho, isn't that the logic? guantanamo is ok because the
people there titare illegal combattants and therefore not entitled to
prisoner of war status? I could swear I remember you saying that. If I
have misunderstood the position please explain.


On /22/08, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> combatant != prisoner of war
>
> You should move, seriously.  We don't want you.  We have enough loonies
> that belong here.
>
> Dana wrote:
> > i have been trying to stay out of this because really, I don't have
> > time. However let me try one more time...
> >
> >
> >> I spent two years working with former Soviet states on energy programs and 
> >> I
> >> often used former Russian defectors as interpreters.
> >
> > And what did you learn from this? You're defending the right of the
> > governement to just come take you away, my friend. Really, you are.
> > Because if it is ok to do this to terrorists... you need to check out
> > the definition of terrorist.
> >
> >> In some rosy past when we were nice little American boys and girls? That's 
> >> a
> >> fairy tale.
> >
> > and yet it is still true according to you below. You aren't making sense.
> >
> >>> We had a stance like "you can torture us, but we will not torture
> >>> you"-- we WILL NOT SINK TO THAT LEVEL.
> >>>
> >> We still do. The perpetrators of Abu Ghraib have been tried and convicted.
> >> The CIA secret jails thing has been hashed out in public and in Congress.
> >> The waterboarding thing has been all over the news forever.
> >
> > The perpetrators of Abu Ghraib :) ha. A few soldiers who followed
> > orders were sacrificed like pawns.  The secret jails, the
> > extraordinary renditions, the black flights have *not* been hashed
> > out. You've still never heard of Maher Arar and there is still a
> > fifteen year old boy at Guantanamo being held without legal
> > representation because of who his family knows.
> >
> >> I'm implying no such thing.  I'm suggesting that at the highest
> >>> levels, the "definition" of torture is being tested.
> >>>
> >> That is why we have an indepedent judiciary, to provide clarity on the
> >> limits of Executive and Legislative power.
> >
> > Yes and the Executive says it does not want to be reviewed by the
> > judiciary. DId you sleep through the whole FISA thing?
> >
> >> If you believe that then you obviously haven't studied Constitutional
> >> history. People are people, they do good and bad. Our structure of
> >> government is designed to contain the damage that can be done by any single
> >> branch of government, precisely because the Founders expected each branch 
> >> of
> >> government to push the envelope.
> >
> > Yes but the Constitution you think protects us is being blatantly 
> > disregarded.
> >
> >> I don't support it. I support specific measures that are finite in scope 
> >> and
> >> duration to combat terrorism. As I noted in another thread, this business 
> >> of
> >> using the Patriot Act to nail Spitzer for prostitution is no good, and the
> >> rules need to be changed.
> >
> > But see, that's just it. SInce anyone can be a terrorist -- you really
> > need to check out that definition --- all those measures apply to
> > *everyone.* And a measure that is for the duration of the war on
> > terror might as well be eternal.
> >
> >> They don't have uniforms, but they definitely are combatants. Why don't you
> >> ask one of the soldiers on the list if they think they guys shooting at 
> >> them
> >> in Iraq and Afghanistan weren't combatants?
> >
> > But they aren't. You really haven't been paying attention, have you.
> > They are not combattants and therefore the Geneva Convention is quaint
> > and and they can be locked up as long as the administratoin pleases.
> > If you don't believe me just ask Alberto Gonzales.
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257181
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to