Ok perhaps my lack of 100% proper grammar threw you. I put `money the
issue?` as one example of a reason why? I was hoping you would expound on my
beginning question and provide something more along the lines of.

No its not really money its more that BD has a much smaller memory
footprint, templates processed faster with less over head.

There should never just be 1 reason to go with 1 product over another. Money
certainly is never an issue with us but it is with some people and i was
wondering if money was the top compelling reason to go for it with some
people becuase i'm sure it is. But with me it is not. So lets try to be
civil again i'll forgive you jumps to insults as i hope you will forgive me
for losing my temper earlier.

On 4/23/08, CyberAngel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am a fucking nut job?
>
> Here is his original response dickhead... And I quote:
>
>
> "Why use bluedragon instead of just buy coldfusion? Money the issue?"
>
>
> I asked I specific question from that point that got me irate. Now you and
> the others have jumped into a conversation, and forgotten what he posted.
>
> Don't be an idiot, not everyone installs something to because of money.
> Some
> of us want to make sure our application works in more than one
> environment.
> I tried to get him to think outside the square, he didn't get it that's
> not
> my problem.
>
> Now you have jumped into it, and Frankly I don't care.
>
> If he wants to buy Coldfusion from Adobe for his reasons that is his
> choice,
> if he thinks that only people who are going to be using something 100% of
> the time then that is his prerogative. But I tried to be polite, get him
> think outside of that mental attitude of thinking and I am the one being
> attacked.
>
> Good bring it on fuck face:-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 12:46 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The BlueDragon Story
>
>
> Wow, you're a fucking nut job.
>
> He didn't say anything against the idea of making your applications
> perform across platforms.  Didn't say anything against you in the least.
>   He asked a functionality question.  No more no less.
>
> Not everyone requires their applications to run on the other 1%.
>
> How many enterprise level installations do you really think are running
> these third party CF interpreters?  Within our government at least,
> outside of the educational sector, I can assure you that number is very
> low.
>
> Jesus, no Bill didn't even comment on your personal trials with DB.Net.
>   He asked a question about the platform in general.
>
> Wow, what a fucking tool.
>
> CyberAngel wrote:
> > Bill...
> >
> > Who fucking cares.
> >
> > At the end of the day, I have the right to make sure my application runs
> on
> > all versions of the CFML products available.
> >
> > But your simple mind couldn't comprehend that, does that mean I am
> fucked
> in
> > the head. No it means that if someone with BlueDragon, Railo, Smith
> Project
> > and an unnamed one that hasn't been released yet works...
> >
> > So your point is what now?
> >
> > I couldn't care whether one is better than the fucking other, what I
> care
> > about is fucking reducing support questions because they installed
> > bluedragon.Net and my app doesn't fucking work on it.
> >
> > Is your head screwed on right, or you just fucking stupid. I don't care
> > about cost, I don't even care what fucking platform it is being run on.
> I
> > just care that it works on whatever someone else has decided to go
> with...
> >
> > End of fucking story dickhead.
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:258962
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to