<delete> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar <valliants...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with >>> Bush. >> >> No. What happened under his leadership was especially bad though. > > And now it's worse because of what he started? Which he didn't start. > He just made it evil so now it's progressively more evil because of > him? > >> Some folk don't like the idea of being watched all the time. I can >> only assume it's because they don't have my luscious physique. > > Tell them to stay out of the big cities and off the internet. > >>> So if Obama says unemployment will stay around 10% for a long time >>> then it's ok because he's honest? >> >> It's more O.K. than if Bush43 had said it, yes. Bush43 was precedent >> setting (LOL!). > > Bush didn't have to say it because he had a plan and it worked. Glad > you're happy with a Change for 5% to 10% unemployment. > >> The rabid right is all over Obama; like bits of crap on a hairy >> asshole. And unlike the rabid left, the rabid right gets shit done. > > When you say shit you mean healthcare? > >> I'm not so scared that Obama will say the sky is red, and that a >> majority of citizens would take it at face value, which *was* the case >> with Bush43. > > That's pretty stupid, you just demonstrated the opposite to be true. > You admit being duped like a cult follower and yet you mock the masses > for not seeing the light. > >> Basically Sam, you're here, so it's lame but generally o.k., comparatively. > > ? > >> Taking us to war on false pretenses? Not so much. > > Still upset about that? Biden said we won that war that he said we > lost. You should be happy. > >>> I don't think anyone was happy with the out-of-control spending during >>> the Bush years. But now it's quadrupled and accelerating. >> >> Yet you, apparently a tea party supporter, didn't even have out of >> control spending on your "Bad Bush" list! > > I thought I did. Doesn't matter. It's the scale, if you were mad at > Bush for spending how you you not be furious with Obama's spending? > >> But *now* it's a Bad Thing. >> Because it's bigger and faster. > > Um yeah. Then: we owe some money and things look good, everyone that > wanted a job could get one. Now: Our grandchildren owe too much money, > unemployment is at 10% and will stay there indefinitely. Russia is > pissing on Obama's leg. China is giggling at us. Some moron from Iran > just out smarted the so-called brightest democrat we had. CA and NY > are just about bankrupt and I'm sure many states will follow. What's > the upside? We will have free insurance in four years if we stay > solvent? > >> Didn't that sorta happen during Bush43's terms too? Why are you >> "suddenly" opposed to it? > > You need to put things in perspective. But if you're willing to take a > day off of work because someone else was five minutes late then you > won't unde > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:318883 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
