So we're taking a quote from 1967 and running with it.. hey lets take another quote from around 1200 that says the earth is flat...
If there was a known scientific relationship it would be wildly accepted.. and you could search and find the answer and know WHY.. but we can't.. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Michael Dinowitz <mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > > "Solar activity, as indicated by sunspots, radio noise and geomagnetic > indices, plays a significant but by no means exclusive role in the > triggering of earthquakes" - > http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967E%26PSL...3..417S > I like that quote. It says something that you don't want to see. A > relationship exists but is in no way exclusive. I think that's the problem > here. You're looking at it as an all or nothing situation. Solar flares > either cause or do not cause earthquakes. The science is seeing the > relationship as one part of the equation, not the whole of it. > Does a solar flare have an effect on the Earths EM field? If yes, does the > Earths EM field have an effect on the physical movement and/or nature of the > planet? If yes, then does the physical movement and/or nature of the planet > relate to earthquakes? If yes then by the chain rule solar flares have an > effect on earthquakes. Not an exclusive effect but an effect none the less. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335126 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
