Maybe they can make use of body scanners instead...if they are useful in airports, why not jails...
-----Original Message----- From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 2:40 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Supreme Court: Strip searches just fine for any offense, no matter how small I have mixed feelings on this one. I can certainly understand the need to make sure no one is bringing contraband into a jail, to provide for the safety of both the jailers and the other inmates. It would be truly tragic if the guy who was picked up on a bad warrant had been shanked by another inmate who had a weapon and had not been searched. This happened to a family member a few years back. On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Judah McAuley <ju...@wiredotter.com> wrote: > ***** > About 13 million people are admitted each year to the nation's jails, > Justice Kennedy wrote. > > Under Monday's ruling, he wrote, "every detainee who will be admitted > to the general population may be required to undergo a close visual > inspection while undressed." > ***** > > 13 million people explicitly covered under this policy as per the > author of the ruling. I, personally, find that shocking and > outrageous. > > Jud ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:349411 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
