Oh well better safe and in jail until its proven if there was evidence to think you were a criminal in the first place. Is he sueing?? If they were so wrong why doesn't he have his clearance back??
I mean if it was me i would be pissed i was in jail but i would understand they can't let me roam free with national security interests like that. He can sue to get his stuff back if it was that unjust. I read on both sides of the story. He was still lookign rather unsavory maybe he realizes he got off easy and not to push his luck "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!" Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: Re: A good american > suuuure the system worked; the guy spent a year in jail, and I think he > lost his security clearance. Hard to get work as a nuclear physicist > without one. All for something which subsequent investigation revealed to > be SOP at Los Alamos. > > Dana > > William Wheatley writes: > > > Sure thats why you dont summarly shoot them and let them goto trial first. > > Now if its wartime and you are a spy well you're dead meat no trial needed > > sometimes by law but he was found innocent. System worked.. > > > > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!" > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM > > Subject: Re: A good american > > > > > > > I am not really in favor of anyone being shot. A spy in wartime *might* be > > > an exception. However, the scientist I mentioned was accused of spying for > > > China, and later on they dropped all charges except one, something like > > > failing to follow proper procedures with classified data. And this was > > > probably because the man had already been on jail almost a year; proper > > > procedures were so rarely followed at Los Alamos that the contract for > > > running the place was recently revoked. Point is, sometimes they are wrong > > > about "spies" too. > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > Wayne Putterill writes: > > > > > > > :) > > > > > > > > I'm a pacifist, I won't ask for anyone to be shot. I'll even give them > > > > the rights they deny other prisoners. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: 11 June 2003 16:17 > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: Re: A good american > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't want to talk to the men in black this week. Therefore > > > > > I have to disagree with you. If we were talking about other > > > > > penalties.... I might not. > > > > > > > > > > Wayne Putterill writes: > > > > > > > > > > > True, in my opinion Bush and Blair may have both betrayed their > > > > > > respective countries by deceiving the population. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Sent: 11 June 2003 16:03 > > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > > Subject: Re: A good american > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suspect that "those who would betray this country" has a > > > > > > > lot of room in it for argument. I am pretty sure that if I > > > > > > > agreed with you on the statement, you and I would not be > > > > > > > agreeing on who should be shot. So that throws up a huge > > > > > > > caution flag in my opinion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John Stanley writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not at all. Those who would betray this country should be > > > > > > > shot. Those > > > > > > > > who serve valiantly this country deserve our respect and > > > > > > > > admiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:55 AM > > > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: A good american > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me put it this way, the sort of belief that deifies > > > > > > > veterans etc > > > > > > > > is as > > > > > > > > dangerous as those who would gladly betray this country. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 09:35 AM 6/11/2003 -0400, John Stanley wrote: > > > > > > > > > >While I hardly think > > > > > > > > > >that my survival depends on the sacrifices of the military, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Let me clarify, do you mean that you do not respect the > > > > > > > veterans who > > > > > > > > >have served and sometimes died for the Untied States? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
