Bill. Let me worry about my blood pressure ok? I just need to remember that 
there is no arguing with people who dont listen.

Dana

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:34:57 -0400, William Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Nope you're reading too much into it. Its a simple point, don't break the
> law. If you don't you don't open yourself up to as much shit as you could
> get otherwise.
>
> Live life knowing that everyone is out to get you and you are the only
> person who really cares about you.
>
> Relax no need to let this get to you its all just friendly banter. Its 
> very
> easy to say follow the law or you have nobody to blame but yourself. It 
> sure
> sucks for the guy and if he was really wrongly accused then he should 
> sue.
> But I really was not being condescending and there's no facts to check, 
> if
> he followed the law he would probably have not gotten on anyone's radar 
> and
> wouldn't have had to put up with the shit no matter what it was.
>
> And on a hypothetical basis just because the DA apologized to him doesn't
> mean anything I'm sure people are snookered sometimes by a good liar or
> whatever.
>
> I was merely saying a simple point...follow the law.
>
> Just friendly banter, relax take some deep breaths. No need to be smug 
> and
> rude with me because deep down the simplicity of my point is obvious to 
> all
> but people who are determined to avoid the point if he followed the law
> regardless of what everyone else did he'd probably still be a whatever he
> was at Los Alamos.
>
>
> "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good
> with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!"
> Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:10 PM
> Subject: Re: A good american
>
>
>> OK, I was thinking about this thread while I was eating my thai chile. 
>> It
>> originally started as a rather flippant remark in response to John'
>> suggestion that we shoot spies. I gave Wen Ho Lee as an example of an
>> accused spy who was apparently innocent. Since then Bill has been 
>> arguing
>> erm, something, and I am letting this thread get to my blood pressure. I
>> really hate when I hear condescension coming from someone who can't be
>> bothered to check facts before making smug pronouncements.
>>
>> Your arguments are slightly different. You are right that ignorance of 
>> the
>> law is not an excuse. That is probably not what happened in the Wen Ho 
>> Lee
>> case, but ok. That case was intended to be an example of 
>> disproportionate
>> penalties and one where the court system did not work.
>>
>> But there is a deeper question here, which is how can you possibly 
>> prevent
>> anyone from ever thinking you have done something wrong, which seems to 
>> be
>> what you are saying. Some people just see wrongdoing everywhere. I have
>> been reported to Child Protective Services for owning a computer 
>> (Florida)
>> and for having a job (New Mexico). The scary thing is that both times 
>> the
>> agencies investigated, though the cases were quickly closed. The answer 
>> to
>> this is *not* to not work because some people think you should stay home
>> with your children and *not* to not own a computer because some people
>> think the internet is evil. You cannot possibly proactively imagine all 
>> of
>> the idiotic things people can dream up in the way of accusations.
>>
>> So if you are saying that he should have considered the possiblity that
>> someone would accuse him of being a spy, I respectfully disagree. You
>> cannot live your life on the basis of trying to never be accused of
>> something.
>>
>> Dana
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:52:56 -0400, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> nacho.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > That is why we have a court system.
>> >
>> > If animal control gets there and says there is nothing wrong, then the
>> > neighbor will just have to deal with it.
>> >
>> > Ignorance of the law/rule is no excuse; you have a responsibility 
>> prior
>> > to
>> > doing something to verify that what you plan to do follows the rules.
>> >
>> > The courts have ruled on this time and time again, just because you
>> > didn't
>> > know it was illegal doesn't mean your are not responsible for it.
>> >
>> > If you are underpaying on your social security, the government has a 
>> way
>> > to
>> > get things back where they are supposed to be. If your company didn't
>> > withhold the correct amount, they will work out a way for you to pay 
>> it
>> > to
>> > them. If the company withheld the correct amount, but didn't send it 
>> in,
>> > then you show proof of this, and they will go after the company.
>> >
>> > They are not going to arrest you because your math was wrong, they 
>> will
>> > audit you, and all parties can work things out. Remember, if you are
>> > underpaying on you social security, you are hurting every American, if
>> > you
>> > cheat on your taxes, you are hurting every American.
>> >
>> > What about those really archaic laws? Those murder laws are pretty 
>> old;
>> > maybe I can just ignore them. If there is a law on the books you need 
>> to
>> > follow the law or accept the consequences, you can try to get the law
>> > changed, or abolished, but until then, it is still a law.
>> >
>> > Obedience of the law is not asked, it is expected.
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:30 PM
>> >> To: CF-Community
>> >> Subject: Re: A good american
>> >>
>> >> hmm. And what if the dog is not being abused but your neighbor feels 
>> no
>> >> dog
>> >> should ever be left outside? And what about the people on this list 
>> who
>> >> have apparently been underpaying their Social Security taxes without
>> >> realizing it? You have to imagine that something is a rule to not 
>> break
>> >> it,
>> >> or that someone might think you are doing somethng wrong and report 
>> it.
>> >> What about all those really archaic laws? I think you guys are
>> >> stretching.
>> >>
>> >> Dana
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to