toys, toys, toys.
> What about sex tech.
>
> larry
>
> At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
> >Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
> >
> >:)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: OT Posts
> >
> > We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and they're kind of OT for
> >this
> > list. Unless your really bitching about a tech problem or it'll segue into
> >a
> > political (or sexual) debate, they should really be posted to CF-Talk or
> >one of
> > the other lists.
> > If this keeps up, people will start to think this is a respectable list!
> >
> > --
> > Michael Dinowitz
> > Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know you had yet
> >
> >----------
> >[
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- OT Posts Michael Dinowitz
- RE: OT Posts Adam Reynolds
- RE: OT Posts Larry C. Lyons
- Re: OT Posts Jim Campbell
- Re: OT Posts Michael Dinowitz
- Re: OT Posts Larry C. Lyons
- Re: OT Posts Jim Campbell
- Re:OT Posts Ben Braver
- Re:OT Posts Larry C. Lyons
- Re: OT Posts Michael Dinowitz
- Re: OT Posts Matthew Small
- Re: OT Posts Marlon Moyer
- Re: OT Posts Matthew Small
- Re: OT Posts Kevin Graeme
- Re: OT Posts Larry C. Lyons
- Re: OT Posts Jacob
- Re: OT Posts Jim Campbell
- RE: OT Posts Erika L Walker-Arnold
- Re: OT Posts Michael Dinowitz
- Re: OT Posts Kevin Graeme