functional regards by CFC's, but quickly writing <cf_dildo> is a lot
funnier than...
<cfinvoke component="hof.toys.naughty.dildo" method="poke">
<cfinvokeargument name="model" value="Vlad The Impaler">
</cfinvoke>
...and takes up less space.
- Jim
Matthew Small wrote:
>New custom tags that I wrote for cf-sex-tech-talk
><cf_dildo>
><cf_plastic_doll>
><cf_horny_robot_midgets>
>
>- Matt Small
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Dinowitz
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Posts
>
>
> toys, toys, toys.
>
> > What about sex tech.
> >
> > larry
> >
> > At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
> > >Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
> > >
> > >:)
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: OT Posts
> > >
> > > We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and they're kind of OT for
> > >this
> > > list. Unless your really bitching about a tech problem or it'll segue into
> > >a
> > > political (or sexual) debate, they should really be posted to CF-Talk or
> > >one of
> > > the other lists.
> > > If this keeps up, people will start to think this is a respectable list!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Dinowitz
> > > Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know you had yet
> > >
> > >----------
> > >[
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
