<cfxxx_horny_robot_midgets>?
larry
At 02:12 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
>those should really be encoded as <cfx_dildo>,<cfx_plastic_doll>, and
><cfx_horny_robot_midgets> :-)
>
>Matthew Small wrote:
>
> > New custom tags that I wrote for cf-sex-tech-talk
> > <cf_dildo>
> > <cf_plastic_doll>
> > <cf_horny_robot_midgets>
> >
> > - Matt Small
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Michael Dinowitz
> > To: CF-Community
> > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: OT Posts
> >
> > toys, toys, toys.
> >
> > > What about sex tech.
> > >
> > > larry
> > >
> > > At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
> > > >Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
> > > >
> > > >:)
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
> > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > Subject: OT Posts
> > > >
> > > > We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and they're kind
> > of OT for
> > > >this
> > > > list. Unless your really bitching about a tech problem or
> > it'll segue into
> > > >a
> > > > political (or sexual) debate, they should really be posted to
> > CF-Talk or
> > > >one of
> > > > the other lists.
> > > > If this keeps up, people will start to think this is a
> > respectable list!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michael Dinowitz
> > > > Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know
> > you had yet
> > > >
> > > >----------
> > > >[
> > >
> >
>
>----------
>[
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
