At 11:27 AM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
>actually shouldn't those be <cfxxx_dildo>,<cfxxx_plastic_doll>, and
><cfxxx_horny_robot_midgets>?
>
>larry
>
>At 02:12 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
> >those should really be encoded as <cfx_dildo>,<cfx_plastic_doll>, and
> ><cfx_horny_robot_midgets> :-)
> >
> >Matthew Small wrote:
> >
> > > New custom tags that I wrote for cf-sex-tech-talk
> > > <cf_dildo>
> > > <cf_plastic_doll>
> > > <cf_horny_robot_midgets>
> > >
> > > - Matt Small
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Michael Dinowitz
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
> > > Subject: Re: OT Posts
> > >
> > > toys, toys, toys.
> > >
> > > > What about sex tech.
> > > >
> > > > larry
> > > >
> > > > At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
> > > > >Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
> > > > >
> > > > >:)
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
> > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > Subject: OT Posts
> > > > >
> > > > > We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and they're kind
> > > of OT for
> > > > >this
> > > > > list. Unless your really bitching about a tech problem or
> > > it'll segue into
> > > > >a
> > > > > political (or sexual) debate, they should really be posted to
> > > CF-Talk or
> > > > >one of
> > > > > the other lists.
> > > > > If this keeps up, people will start to think this is a
> > > respectable list!
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Michael Dinowitz
> > > > > Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know
> > > you had yet
> > > > >
> > > > >----------
> > > > >[
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >----------
> >[
>
>----------
>[
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
