- Matt Small
----- Original Message -----
From: Marlon Moyer
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
those should really be encoded as <cfx_dildo>,<cfx_plastic_doll>, and
<cfx_horny_robot_midgets> :-)
Matthew Small wrote:
> New custom tags that I wrote for cf-sex-tech-talk
> <cf_dildo>
> <cf_plastic_doll>
> <cf_horny_robot_midgets>
>
> - Matt Small
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Dinowitz
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Posts
>
> toys, toys, toys.
>
> > What about sex tech.
> >
> > larry
> >
> > At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
> > >Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
> > >
> > >:)
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: OT Posts
> > >
> > > We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and they're kind
> of OT for
> > >this
> > > list. Unless your really bitching about a tech problem or
> it'll segue into
> > >a
> > > political (or sexual) debate, they should really be posted to
> CF-Talk or
> > >one of
> > > the other lists.
> > > If this keeps up, people will start to think this is a
> respectable list!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Dinowitz
> > > Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know
> you had yet
> > >
> > >----------
> > >[
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
