I do have to honestly say that despite my worries going in, XP Pro has been rock solid and better stability-wise than 2k for me. I tended to demo a lot of software on my development system (install it and remove it), and XP seems to "clean up" better. 2k always required a reinstall every X-months, XP has been incredible. Actually seems faster, too.
I'm not pushing it out throughout the enterprise strictly from a cost standpoint, but if cost weren't an issue, I would have XP all over the place. Josh -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Developer Platform suggestions was Re: Nice > XP + Java works fine. Better than win2k. hate. Win2k. Really? I haven't had any problems, and wouldn't hesitate to recommend Win2K for developers' machines. In fact, I'm not really interested in XP at all, since Win2K works so well for us. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
