FYI, we're working with Dave to figure out what's up with this failure.

Thanks

--------
Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
From: "Dave Carabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:01:36 -0500

Make that 99 fixes. The WDDX bug that is claimed to have been fixed (Bug 
49064), at least using CFMX for JRun, is not (The description is: "The 
cfwddx tag did not properly handle packets marked as version 0.9"). This is 
a major point-of-failure for us, as we still receive the following error 
when trying to deserialize a WDDX packet marked as version 0.9:

WDDX packet parse error at line 1, column -1. Relative URI "wddx_0090.dtd";
can not be resolved without a base URI..

Any chance there might be a hotfix for this?

Thanks,
Dave.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to