Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See http://www.mach-ii.com/
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: > I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent > application. > It worked very well, with a very high level of code management. > Begining > with > file structure > > index.cfm is the only exposed page of the applicaiton. > application.xml for application level control/instantiation > > system/model/data -- contains data objects > system/model/logic -- logic controls > system/model/validator -- validation controls for forms etc > > system/controller -- controller files > system/view -- all view sub-components or pages. > > controller.xml for flow control and method execution mappings.. > similar to > whats > done in Jakarta Struts except ...*.cfc used here. All method mappings > are > executed > dynamically and variables in the xml mapping get the result or set > values in > variables scope. View Components do NOT touch high level scope > variables > like > client/session/application. > > I have been quite happy with the Model.. Once the model is written.. > all you > do is > write your data layer methods and view pages.. and you are done.. The > controller does > the rest of the job. > >> Ease of development and organization > Heavy resistance from other CF Developers at first.. but then some > started > to realize > the benefits... Others are hung on the Fusebox 3 Case Style. > > If you are really excited about developing some class applications and > tight > coding... it becomes very hard > to work with developers who arent looking to improve.. but just get the > project done... > > Joe Eugene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Smith, Don , CTR , WHS/PSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:50 PM > Subject: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > >> Is anyone using Jakarta Struts for CFMX and can they comment toward >> its > use? >> >> I am looking for a published development framework that would be >> flexible >> enough for development in, plus allow our team to investigate new >> technologies outside of CFMX -I like what I read of Struts' >> integration of >> Java technology but I haven't implemented it yet. >> >> I'm working with some staff for whom integration of existing Java > libraries >> would be a stretch and others who could handle it easily, but it would >> require ramp-up time and >> education. >> >> I am hoping to find a framework that would allow me to point new > developers >> to existing materials so I would not have to write up an entire "code >> like > I >> do" book. I am also hoping that it would add something on top of >> CFMX and >> not merely reorganize CFMX without adding anything. >> >> How was your: >> Ease of development and organization >> Integration with Java for non-Java programmers >> Success rate in getting users to adapt >> >> THANKS! >> >> Don >> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
