>From the preso slides (http://www.mach-ii.com/downloads/MachII-Preso.ppt):
In keeping with the language-neutral nature of the architecture, we've adopted a new name: Mach-II chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:59 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > >> Mach II == Fusebox MX. >Any reason why they renamed Fusebox MX to Mach II? > >Joe Eugene > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:40 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? >> >> >> Mach II == Fusebox MX. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Joe Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:37 PM >> Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? >> >> >> > > http://www.mach-ii.com/ >> > >> > Interesting.. didnt know Hal Helms and group were working on another >> > Framework Project. >> > >> > > Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). >> > I havent looked deep into Fusebox MX, its still in beta. Honestly, >> > didnt quite understand the whole idea of Circuits/Parsed files etc. >> > >> > I would rather just use a base Controller/Parser and multiple >> > Controller helpers.. alot like Jakarta Struts.. Minus some of >> > the Complexity in Struts. >> > >> > Joe Eugene >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:24 PM >> > > To: CF-Talk >> > > Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? >> > > >> > > >> > > Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See >> > > http://www.mach-ii.com/ >> > > >> > > On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: >> > > >> > > > I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent >> > > > application. >> > > > It worked very well, with a very high level of code management. >> > > > Begining >> > > > with >> > > > file structure >> > > > >> > > > index.cfm is the only exposed page of the applicaiton. >> > > > application.xml for application level control/instantiation >> > > > >> > > > system/model/data -- contains data objects >> > > > system/model/logic -- logic controls >> > > > system/model/validator -- validation controls for forms etc >> > > > >> > > > system/controller -- controller files >> > > > system/view -- all view sub-components or pages. >> > > > >> > > > controller.xml for flow control and method execution mappings.. >> > > > similar to >> > > > whats >> > > > done in Jakarta Struts except ...*.cfc used here. All >> method mappings >> > > > are >> > > > executed >> > > > dynamically and variables in the xml mapping get the result or set >> > > > values in >> > > > variables scope. View Components do NOT touch high level scope >> > > > variables >> > > > like >> > > > client/session/application. >> > > > >> > > > I have been quite happy with the Model.. Once the model is written.. >> > > > all you >> > > > do is >> > > > write your data layer methods and view pages.. and you are >> done.. The >> > > > controller does >> > > > the rest of the job. >> > > > >> > > >> Ease of development and organization >> > > > Heavy resistance from other CF Developers at first.. but then some >> > > > started >> > > > to realize >> > > > the benefits... Others are hung on the Fusebox 3 Case Style. >> > > > >> > > > If you are really excited about developing some class >> applications and >> > > > tight >> > > > coding... it becomes very hard >> > > > to work with developers who arent looking to improve.. but just get >> the >> > > > project done... >> > > > >> > > > Joe Eugene >> > > > >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > > From: "Smith, Don , CTR , WHS/PSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:50 PM >> > > > Subject: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> Is anyone using Jakarta Struts for CFMX and can they comment >toward >> > > >> its >> > > > use? >> > > >> >> > > >> I am looking for a published development framework that would be >> > > >> flexible >> > > >> enough for development in, plus allow our team to investigate new >> > > >> technologies outside of CFMX -I like what I read of Struts' >> > > >> integration of >> > > >> Java technology but I haven't implemented it yet. >> > > >> >> > > >> I'm working with some staff for whom integration of existing Java >> > > > libraries >> > > >> would be a stretch and others who could handle it easily, but it >> would >> > > >> require ramp-up time and >> > > >> education. >> > > >> >> > > >> I am hoping to find a framework that would allow me to point new >> > > > developers >> > > >> to existing materials so I would not have to write up an >> entire "code >> > > >> like >> > > > I >> > > >> do" book. I am also hoping that it would add something on top of >> > > >> CFMX and >> > > >> not merely reorganize CFMX without adding anything. >> > > >> >> > > >> How was your: >> > > >> Ease of development and organization >> > > >> Integration with Java for non-Java programmers >> > > >> Success rate in getting users to adapt >> > > >> >> > > >> THANKS! >> > > >> >> > > >> Don >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
