> Mach II == Fusebox MX. Any reason why they renamed Fusebox MX to Mach II?
Joe Eugene > -----Original Message----- > From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:40 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > Mach II == Fusebox MX. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joe Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:37 PM > Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > > > http://www.mach-ii.com/ > > > > Interesting.. didnt know Hal Helms and group were working on another > > Framework Project. > > > > > Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). > > I havent looked deep into Fusebox MX, its still in beta. Honestly, > > didnt quite understand the whole idea of Circuits/Parsed files etc. > > > > I would rather just use a base Controller/Parser and multiple > > Controller helpers.. alot like Jakarta Struts.. Minus some of > > the Complexity in Struts. > > > > Joe Eugene > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:24 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > > > > > > > Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See > > > http://www.mach-ii.com/ > > > > > > On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: > > > > > > > I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent > > > > application. > > > > It worked very well, with a very high level of code management. > > > > Begining > > > > with > > > > file structure > > > > > > > > index.cfm is the only exposed page of the applicaiton. > > > > application.xml for application level control/instantiation > > > > > > > > system/model/data -- contains data objects > > > > system/model/logic -- logic controls > > > > system/model/validator -- validation controls for forms etc > > > > > > > > system/controller -- controller files > > > > system/view -- all view sub-components or pages. > > > > > > > > controller.xml for flow control and method execution mappings.. > > > > similar to > > > > whats > > > > done in Jakarta Struts except ...*.cfc used here. All > method mappings > > > > are > > > > executed > > > > dynamically and variables in the xml mapping get the result or set > > > > values in > > > > variables scope. View Components do NOT touch high level scope > > > > variables > > > > like > > > > client/session/application. > > > > > > > > I have been quite happy with the Model.. Once the model is written.. > > > > all you > > > > do is > > > > write your data layer methods and view pages.. and you are > done.. The > > > > controller does > > > > the rest of the job. > > > > > > > >> Ease of development and organization > > > > Heavy resistance from other CF Developers at first.. but then some > > > > started > > > > to realize > > > > the benefits... Others are hung on the Fusebox 3 Case Style. > > > > > > > > If you are really excited about developing some class > applications and > > > > tight > > > > coding... it becomes very hard > > > > to work with developers who arent looking to improve.. but just get > the > > > > project done... > > > > > > > > Joe Eugene > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Smith, Don , CTR , WHS/PSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:50 PM > > > > Subject: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > > > > > > > > > >> Is anyone using Jakarta Struts for CFMX and can they comment toward > > > >> its > > > > use? > > > >> > > > >> I am looking for a published development framework that would be > > > >> flexible > > > >> enough for development in, plus allow our team to investigate new > > > >> technologies outside of CFMX -I like what I read of Struts' > > > >> integration of > > > >> Java technology but I haven't implemented it yet. > > > >> > > > >> I'm working with some staff for whom integration of existing Java > > > > libraries > > > >> would be a stretch and others who could handle it easily, but it > would > > > >> require ramp-up time and > > > >> education. > > > >> > > > >> I am hoping to find a framework that would allow me to point new > > > > developers > > > >> to existing materials so I would not have to write up an > entire "code > > > >> like > > > > I > > > >> do" book. I am also hoping that it would add something on top of > > > >> CFMX and > > > >> not merely reorganize CFMX without adding anything. > > > >> > > > >> How was your: > > > >> Ease of development and organization > > > >> Integration with Java for non-Java programmers > > > >> Success rate in getting users to adapt > > > >> > > > >> THANKS! > > > >> > > > >> Don > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
