Mach II == Fusebox MX. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:37 PM Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
> > http://www.mach-ii.com/ > > Interesting.. didnt know Hal Helms and group were working on another > Framework Project. > > > Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). > I havent looked deep into Fusebox MX, its still in beta. Honestly, > didnt quite understand the whole idea of Circuits/Parsed files etc. > > I would rather just use a base Controller/Parser and multiple > Controller helpers.. alot like Jakarta Struts.. Minus some of > the Complexity in Struts. > > Joe Eugene > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:24 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > > > > Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See > > http://www.mach-ii.com/ > > > > On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: > > > > > I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent > > > application. > > > It worked very well, with a very high level of code management. > > > Begining > > > with > > > file structure > > > > > > index.cfm is the only exposed page of the applicaiton. > > > application.xml for application level control/instantiation > > > > > > system/model/data -- contains data objects > > > system/model/logic -- logic controls > > > system/model/validator -- validation controls for forms etc > > > > > > system/controller -- controller files > > > system/view -- all view sub-components or pages. > > > > > > controller.xml for flow control and method execution mappings.. > > > similar to > > > whats > > > done in Jakarta Struts except ...*.cfc used here. All method mappings > > > are > > > executed > > > dynamically and variables in the xml mapping get the result or set > > > values in > > > variables scope. View Components do NOT touch high level scope > > > variables > > > like > > > client/session/application. > > > > > > I have been quite happy with the Model.. Once the model is written.. > > > all you > > > do is > > > write your data layer methods and view pages.. and you are done.. The > > > controller does > > > the rest of the job. > > > > > >> Ease of development and organization > > > Heavy resistance from other CF Developers at first.. but then some > > > started > > > to realize > > > the benefits... Others are hung on the Fusebox 3 Case Style. > > > > > > If you are really excited about developing some class applications and > > > tight > > > coding... it becomes very hard > > > to work with developers who arent looking to improve.. but just get the > > > project done... > > > > > > Joe Eugene > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Smith, Don , CTR , WHS/PSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:50 PM > > > Subject: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > > > > > > >> Is anyone using Jakarta Struts for CFMX and can they comment toward > > >> its > > > use? > > >> > > >> I am looking for a published development framework that would be > > >> flexible > > >> enough for development in, plus allow our team to investigate new > > >> technologies outside of CFMX -I like what I read of Struts' > > >> integration of > > >> Java technology but I haven't implemented it yet. > > >> > > >> I'm working with some staff for whom integration of existing Java > > > libraries > > >> would be a stretch and others who could handle it easily, but it would > > >> require ramp-up time and > > >> education. > > >> > > >> I am hoping to find a framework that would allow me to point new > > > developers > > >> to existing materials so I would not have to write up an entire "code > > >> like > > > I > > >> do" book. I am also hoping that it would add something on top of > > >> CFMX and > > >> not merely reorganize CFMX without adding anything. > > >> > > >> How was your: > > >> Ease of development and organization > > >> Integration with Java for non-Java programmers > > >> Success rate in getting users to adapt > > >> > > >> THANKS! > > >> > > >> Don > > >> > > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
