> Strictly speaking you're dead on the money. However I wonder how many
> of the apps in the lower-end realm we are talking about here would
> need or even appreciate the difference unless someone benched it, and
> then, would anyone notice? Again, I think when you want to start
pretty much all of them i'd guess. db interactions are important, if your
app sucks at, your app sucks.
> an application dev team etc. It won't be a small/medium site
> developed in toto by one person and perhaps skinned by another.
sure it would. if your app uses a db then you better make sure you're using
it properly, size doesn't really matter. if you take on a db as part of app
development then you should be using the db to it's fullest extent possible.
> I wonder how many developers optimize everything into the db like that?
no idea but that's not what i said. i try to get my money's worth out of a
db. it does certain things better than cf, etc. and it should be used for
those things.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... James Smith
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus o... Dave Watts
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gu... Peter Farrell
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Securit... Matt Robertson
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Massimo, Tiziana e Federica
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Jochem van Dieten
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS:... Matt Robertson
- Re: Access alternatives ... Paul Hastings
- Re: Access alternati... Matt Robertson
- Re: Access alternati... Paul Hastings
- Re: Access alternatives ... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Access alternati... Mark A Kruger
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Securit... Claude Schneegans
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus o... Dave Watts
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus o... Micha Schopman
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus o... Micha Schopman