For Oracle and other non-free vendors, there is a benchmark:
http://www.tpc.org/
FWIW, David obviously had MySQL mis-configured. :)
Or else maybe he didn't *believe* it would work very well, and thus, it didn't.
And FWIW*2, there are a couple open source versions of CF now.
The best reason for using MS SQL is that you're an MS shop, and have
tons of licenses for everything, don't mind the $$$ per processor, per
user, etc., etc..
I prefer freedom, personally.
--
There are admirable potentialities in every human being. Believe in
your strength and your youth. Learn to repeat endlessly to yourself,
'It all depends on me.'
Andre Gide
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:49 AM, James Holmes wrote:
>
> We use Oracle instead of SQL Server for the same reason :-)
>
> mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
> http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
>
> 2009/9/5 David McGuigan :
>>Now I kind of see SQL Server the same way I see ColdFusion. You pay for it
> because it's better.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:326056
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
