I certainly hope so ... DWMX has a lot of potential, but removing excellent functionality and replacing it with so-so FrontPage-like features certainly won't win any points with MY team.
Macromedia, please don't swallow Studio whole - Dreamweaver isn't THAT good. DreamweaverMX is supposed to be the best of both worlds - coders want non-invasive control of remote content. Joshua Miller Web Development :: Programming Eagle Web Development LLC www.eaglewd.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] (304) 622-5676 (Clarksburg Office) (304) 456-4942 (Home Office) -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:43 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking? Haven't played with the Synchronize functionality of DWMX. But I have used UltraDev. The synch function in UltraDev makes sure the folder/file structure of your target source matches your local source - and the site files were transfered. Again, I think the integration of DW and CF Studio is well on it's way, and MM has done an excellent job at it thus far. But, there's still a few hicups to iron out. However, DWMX is still in release candidate phase - maybe these will be gone when the official release comes out. Shawn Grover -----Original Message----- From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking? At 10:17 AM 5/6/2002 -0600, you wrote: >I don't work with RDS or FTP, but I've already determined that I'll be >sticking with CF Studio 4.5.2 for the web app I'm developing. Simply >because I don't like the idea of building a SITE in DWMX so I can work >with my files (yes, I know I can edit my files without a site, but you >loose some >of the functionality of DW if you don't create a site - such as dynamic >content - unless you manually code everything.) I don't like the ideas >of these extra files floating around my web directories. When I build >an app, the files within my app folder(s) are files required by the >app. This site file serves no purpose when I deliver my site, and >becomes an extra step to remember if I don't want to transfer that file >to my live site. I agree with you. That is my biggest bite about Dreamweaver sites. At least they aren't as bad as Frontpage, though, right? Do those extra folders transfer if you the Dreamweaver synchronize functionality? -- Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Need a Web Developer? Contact me! AIM: Reboog711 | Fax / Phone: 860-223-7946 -- My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com -- Will I be on the streets tomorrow, Will I have to beg and Borrow Will I have to go back to the job I left behind? ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
