oi Joshua!! /me thought that's why they included homesite+ *grinz*
-- Critz Certified Adv. ColdFusion Developer Crit[s2k] - <CF_ChannelOP Network="Efnet" Channel="ColdFusion"> ------------------------------------ Monday, May 6, 2002, 12:56:54 PM, you wrote: JM> I certainly hope so ... DWMX has a lot of potential, but removing JM> excellent functionality and replacing it with so-so FrontPage-like JM> features certainly won't win any points with MY team. JM> Macromedia, please don't swallow Studio whole - Dreamweaver isn't THAT JM> good. DreamweaverMX is supposed to be the best of both worlds - coders JM> want non-invasive control of remote content. JM> Joshua Miller JM> Web Development :: Programming JM> Eagle Web Development LLC JM> www.eaglewd.com JM> [EMAIL PROTECTED] JM> (304) 622-5676 (Clarksburg Office) JM> (304) 456-4942 (Home Office) JM> -----Original Message----- JM> From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] JM> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:43 PM JM> To: CF-Talk JM> Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking? JM> Haven't played with the Synchronize functionality of DWMX. But I have JM> used UltraDev. The synch function in UltraDev makes sure the JM> folder/file structure of your target source matches your local source - JM> and the site files were transfered. JM> Again, I think the integration of DW and CF Studio is well on it's way, JM> and MM has done an excellent job at it thus far. But, there's still a JM> few hicups to iron out. However, DWMX is still in release candidate JM> phase - maybe these will be gone when the official release comes out. JM> Shawn Grover JM> -----Original Message----- JM> From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] JM> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM JM> To: CF-Talk JM> Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking? JM> At 10:17 AM 5/6/2002 -0600, you wrote: >>I don't work with RDS or FTP, but I've already determined that I'll be >>sticking with CF Studio 4.5.2 for the web app I'm developing. Simply >>because I don't like the idea of building a SITE in DWMX so I can work >>with my files (yes, I know I can edit my files without a site, but you >>loose JM> some >>of the functionality of DW if you don't create a site - such as dynamic >>content - unless you manually code everything.) I don't like the ideas >>of these extra files floating around my web directories. When I build >>an app, the files within my app folder(s) are files required by the >>app. This site file serves no purpose when I deliver my site, and >>becomes an extra step to remember if I don't want to transfer that file >>to my live site. JM> I agree with you. That is my biggest bite about Dreamweaver sites. JM> At least they aren't as bad as Frontpage, though, right? JM> Do those extra folders transfer if you the Dreamweaver synchronize JM> functionality? JM> -- JM> Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JM> Need a Web Developer? Contact me! JM> AIM: Reboog711 | Fax / Phone: 860-223-7946 JM> -- JM> My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com JM> My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com JM> -- JM> Will I be on the streets tomorrow, Will I have to beg and Borrow Will I JM> have to go back to the job I left behind? JM> ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
