> /me thought that's why they included homesite+ *grinz*
Yeah, it's hilarious alright. The whole Homesite+ thing begs the question:
Why roll all that Homesite/Studio functionality into Dreamweaver if we're
still going to have to switch applications to do basic, day-to-day,
line-to-line tasks? Personally, I'm more likely to launch Homesite[+] and
stick with it and only launch Dreamweaver when I'm doing basic inital page
layout. And if that's the case, I don't want Dreamweaver to be a huge
resource-hogging program that's going to bog things down when I make the
switch.
I'm not saying Dreamweaver MX isn't a step in the right direction--it looks
like a great product, and is a real advance in functionality for anyone
accustomed to Dreamweaver "Basic." But it's not there yet as a replacement
for Studio, and that leaves us Studio-users in 5.0-land in the foreseeable
future.
-- Owen
> JM> I certainly hope so ... DWMX has a lot of potential, but removing
> JM> excellent functionality and replacing it with so-so FrontPage-like
> JM> features certainly won't win any points with MY team.
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
