I'm asking about pushing it into the request scope more than anything. Just checking to see if people cringe at the thought or not. =)
Thanks, ~Todd On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Raymond Camden wrote: > Are you asking about pushing it into the request scope or putting it > into a variable in general? I don' think there is anything wrong with > either. Certainly if you want your custom tags to use the CFC it makes > since to put it in the request scope. > > ======================================================================= > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:19 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Opinion: CFC / Request scope question. > > > > > > I actually use #2 a lot (cept, I wrap script around all that)... > > I find it easier to work with. However, I'd still like to > > know peoples > > thoughts on pushing a component into the request scope. > > > > Just to clarify: > > <cfscript> > > x = createObject("component","test"); > > request.x = x; > > </cfscript> > > > > Now .. 'request.x' is available to even other cfcs without > > having to make > > an additional invoke/createObject call. > > > > ~Todd ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
