You can defend the idea of you application as one or not, that is your choice. The issue is not whether or not you applications is one site or not, and you have taken this past the original discussion.
I will not get into an argument whether your right or wrong on your application. The point I made was very clear, and I would appreciate that you look at the original reply you made this statement too. Think about it and then get back too me, otherwise you are going to end up agreeing with me:-) -----Original Message----- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 28 June 2002 8:49 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope? > All I am saying is that the application is sharing all the > code, hence it is one application that pretends to many > websites. As far as I am concerned I will always treat it > as one app, and not 2 if there are 2 sites. > Hope that makes sense:-) I tend to think of sites in the terms that visitors think of sites... so to any visitor, it's multiple sites... and that really was what was being said originally anyhow, i.e.: > I was merely pointing out that when you say "You seem to > think application is across websites, this is not true." -- it's > really a non-sequitur -- websites or domains and application > vars have zero to do with one another... It may be a single application to the developer, but it is indeed multiple websites to the visitors -- and they share an application scope. So I maintain my position: it's a non-sequitur -- they have nothing to do with one-another... Isaac www.turnkey.to 954-776-0046 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
