At the risk of being ignited I want to say this, please.  Isaac made an
exceptional point which is worthy of repetition: -

: > Because it's important for us to think about the work that
: > we do from
: > the
: > perspective of our users -- as entertaining as our
: > tech-centric ways of
: > thinking may be

100% on the button in my opinion, I just did not want this to get lost in
the rhetoric.

All's well that ends well:-o))<<<(double chin!)

Mike Brunt - CTO
Webapper Services LLC
http://www.webapper.com
Downey CA Office
562.243.6255

"Making the NET Work"

-----Original Message-----
From: David Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What is the best variable scope?


No offense guys, but shouldn't this be a private discussion by now?  I
don't recall debates as being the purpose of the list.

----- Original Message -----
From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?


: > Nice wording, but still what does that have to do with the
: > original thread?
:
: So now you're complaining because I didn't change the subject line?
.
:
: It was about the comment that Application variables don't span
multiple
: websites ... which isn't necessarily true...
:
: Remember also that any member of the list, a developer though they may
be,
: becomes a visitor when they hit one of those sites and will view them
as
: individual sites. Only once we inform them that they are all run out
of the
: same directory with a single <cfapplication> tag are they "on the
inside"
: and maybe view it as a single application as opposed to a collection
of
: sites. I still view them as a collection of sites -- and a single
: application which operates / manages them. I suspect I'm not alone in
that.
:
: Isaac
:
: www.turnkey.to
: 954-776-0046
:
: > -----Original Message-----
: > From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
: > Sent: Sunday, 30 June 2002 12:52 AM
: > To: CF-Talk
: > Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
: >
: >> Exactly my point, and as the user is not reading these
: >> emails then why make that a point when you and I both
: >> know otherwise :-)
: >
: > Because it's important for us to think about the work that
: > we do from
: > the
: > perspective of our users -- as entertaining as our
: > tech-centric ways of
: > thinking may be, they don't help us communicate with our
: > customers or
: > clients and if we don't make an active attempt to think
: > about our work
: > the
: > way that our users will, we can (and often do) detract
: > from the user
: > experience and ultimately injure our fiscal bottom line as
: > a result.
:
: > Isaac
:
: > www.turnkey.to
: > 954-776-0046
:
:
: > __________________________________________________________
: > ____________
: > Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the
: > official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
: > FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
: > Archives:
: > http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
: > Unsubscribe:
: > http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
:
:
:

______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to