Perhaps that will be my next assignment. "What programming Framework are you?"
Me thinks the audience would be a bit niche, but vocal. Chad who goes for a two-story framework, but the occasional Queenslander or brick granny-flat also does the trick On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Kym Kovan <dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au> wrote: > On 15/05/2010 6:21 PM, Steve Onnis wrote: > >> Nope its not what matters. If it was then we wouldn't have framwork >> pushers >> now would we :P >> > > Steve! That's sacrilege! :-) > > As a non-framework person, except our own of course, I enjoy the various > folk that have decided to use one framework rather than another and then get > evangelistic about it. But frameworks rule!(according to the fans) > > In reality I have always had dilemmas about frameworks, none cover all > bases so you need to know more than one and then "why bother?". I was > impressed with FW/1 with its description at WebDU last week, so Phil you > have to keep up the good work, as a tool to have a "non-interventionist" > framework but we had the problem recently in terms of a tool we have been > using in-house for many years now, our own CMS. We have decided to go Open > Source with it but like all internal "products" it is full of all sorts of > silly stuff and in our case it was used in the early days by our trainees to > hone their CF skills so has some seriously silly things there. In the years > since then it has evolved and is now used for some serious websites but as > it grew we felt we were following down the same path that FarCry followed, a > CMS that turned into a framework. So we have steered away from that: "we are > not a framework!" :-) FarCry is great, why duplicate it? > > Well we didn't, it is not a framework (INAF, can I copyright that?). We > call the beast SLCMS (choose you own acronym for the SL bit but officially > it is Simple Light (from a users perspective)) and even though we have not > yet released it yet as Open Source in the sense that we are still tidying it > up in our spare time you can find it at: http://svn.slcms.net/codebase/ > (having watched the brilliant session on git at WebDU we have just moved to > Mercurial (interesting how one thing leads to another) but we will keep the > SVN version current once we get to a release version.) > > Chad, see what you have started? You haven't changed :-) > > > -- > > Yours, > > Kym Kovan > mbcomms.net.au > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "cfaussie" group. > To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<cfaussie%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
