You got the label wrong for Q19_2 <td><input name="Q19" id="*Q19_2*" value="2" type="radio"></td> <td><label for="*Q19_*">I believe it is more important to be gentle than firm</label></td>
dfawe On 15/05/10 18:54, Chad Renando wrote: > Perhaps that will be my next assignment. "What programming Framework > are you?" > > Me thinks the audience would be a bit niche, but vocal. > > Chad > who goes for a two-story framework, but the occasional Queenslander or > brick granny-flat also does the trick > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Kym Kovan <dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au > <mailto:dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au>> wrote: > > On 15/05/2010 6:21 PM, Steve Onnis wrote: > > Nope its not what matters. If it was then we wouldn't have > framwork pushers > now would we :P > > > Steve! That's sacrilege! :-) > > As a non-framework person, except our own of course, I enjoy the > various folk that have decided to use one framework rather than > another and then get evangelistic about it. But frameworks > rule!(according to the fans) > > In reality I have always had dilemmas about frameworks, none cover > all bases so you need to know more than one and then "why > bother?". I was impressed with FW/1 with its description at WebDU > last week, so Phil you have to keep up the good work, as a tool to > have a "non-interventionist" framework but we had the problem > recently in terms of a tool we have been using in-house for many > years now, our own CMS. We have decided to go Open Source with it > but like all internal "products" it is full of all sorts of silly > stuff and in our case it was used in the early days by our > trainees to hone their CF skills so has some seriously silly > things there. In the years since then it has evolved and is now > used for some serious websites but as it grew we felt we were > following down the same path that FarCry followed, a CMS that > turned into a framework. So we have steered away from that: "we > are not a framework!" :-) FarCry is great, why duplicate it? > > Well we didn't, it is not a framework (INAF, can I copyright > that?). We call the beast SLCMS (choose you own acronym for the SL > bit but officially it is Simple Light (from a users perspective)) > and even though we have not yet released it yet as Open Source in > the sense that we are still tidying it up in our spare time you > can find it at: http://svn.slcms.net/codebase/ > (having watched the brilliant session on git at WebDU we have just > moved to Mercurial (interesting how one thing leads to another) > but we will keep the SVN version current once we get to a release > version.) > > Chad, see what you have started? You haven't changed :-) > > > -- > > Yours, > > Kym Kovan > mbcomms.net.au <http://mbcomms.net.au/> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
