> Timm Murray: > > Large datastores tend to centralize the network. Datastores don't fill up as > > quickly and your node caches more data and less data falls out. On the surface, > > this seems like an advantage; indeed, for a node operator's short term gain, it > > is an advantage. However, over the long term it tends to hurt routing. Nodes > > won't be requesting as much data from other nodes, and thus won't discover new > > nodes through requests. > > I haven't seen _any_ compelling argument why above-average nodes > should attract more than their "fair share" of requests. What's > yours?
Over time, the large node simply accumulates more data from Freenet. This means there should be more nodes which point to data on the large node. Thus, there will be more requests routed to the large node. _______________________________________________ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
