We currently have a hack of sorts in mind (well an issue filed on gyp) that
would cover a larger class of settings changes (the worst handled by vstudio
directly). The idea is to have gyp generate a text file full of settings
garp which would be an additional dependency of each project.
There are of course other dependency flaws (sgk is working on a long running
validation build that would look for missing links in the chain) that are
just due to mistakes in the gyp files.

I would be curious which kind of dependency issue these latest ones were
(can someone point me at the CLs?, been on nacl/o3d buildbot stuff of late).

-BradN

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jor...@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Such a system does not help when people sync your change. We should
>> invest the effort we would expend building this system fixing the
>> dependency issues.
>
>
> gclient could be made to obey it as well.  But I agree, it's a hack.
>
>
>> Barring that, we have a hack that we do where for resource files we
>> make a whitespace change to the corresponding .gyp. We could automate
>> this by having a presubmit check that enforces this.
>
>
> Better than nothing.
>
> We also have the hack for grd files that deletes all the associated .h
> files.  Something like that might work here as well.
>
> How hard would it be to make the system actually understand the
> dependencies?  Is visual studio really just too dumb to understand?
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to