We currently have a hack of sorts in mind (well an issue filed on gyp) that would cover a larger class of settings changes (the worst handled by vstudio directly). The idea is to have gyp generate a text file full of settings garp which would be an additional dependency of each project. There are of course other dependency flaws (sgk is working on a long running validation build that would look for missing links in the chain) that are just due to mistakes in the gyp files.
I would be curious which kind of dependency issue these latest ones were (can someone point me at the CLs?, been on nacl/o3d buildbot stuff of late). -BradN On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jor...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Such a system does not help when people sync your change. We should >> invest the effort we would expend building this system fixing the >> dependency issues. > > > gclient could be made to obey it as well. But I agree, it's a hack. > > >> Barring that, we have a hack that we do where for resource files we >> make a whitespace change to the corresponding .gyp. We could automate >> this by having a presubmit check that enforces this. > > > Better than nothing. > > We also have the hack for grd files that deletes all the associated .h > files. Something like that might work here as well. > > How hard would it be to make the system actually understand the > dependencies? Is visual studio really just too dumb to understand? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---