What are you kidding with this one. This guy don't know about a bug in
software and you think he is not a ccie.
Then after this blather you make the brilliant statement this is what the
data center manager told me.
You were playing with the network and you brought down the firewall and you
want to check somebody elses credentials.
Or maybe there is a valid reason to ping a large number of hosts
simultaneously, could you tell us what that reason is.
Duck
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Raul F. Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE


> Raul-
>
> I brought down the local checkpoint firewall by pinging an large number of
> hosts simultaneously. I asked him (the bogus ccie) why he thought that
would
> bring down the firewall? His reply? "The fact that I pinged more than 50
> hosts rapid fire caused the NT and Solaris servers on the LAN to start
> flooding the wire with excessive SMB traffic, and since the firewall saw
> that much SMB traffic it thought I was an intruder and shut down the
> interface I was attached to." Real reason: The old Firewall one software
had
> a bug that misallocated memory for packet queues on internal interfaces.
My
> excessive pinging caused the queue to overflow and the software itself
> crashed. An update fixed the problem. At least that was what the data
center
> manager told me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Raul F. Fernandez
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:57 AM
> To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
> Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>
>
> Dear folks,
>
> I have to agree with Tim on this one. It may have been possible that the
> person at this site just did not pay enough attention to the question
posed
> or that he may not known the answer. I do not know thew nature of the
> question. Perhaps Mark could be kind  enough to let us know what the
> question was or were. Now depending on the nature and difficulty of the
> question it may justify his not being able to answer it. If he is lying he
> should be disciplined because he lied and because he has taken for granted
> all the blood sweat and tears that goes into getting a CCIE. I think too
> many folks get caught up in the CCIE and forget all the real hard work
that
> goes into it. Basically, if he does not know the answer to a perplexing
> question he should at least be able to outline a troubleshooting plan to
> find it.
>
> Raul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>
>
> >Just because a guy can config a router it does not make him a god. Lets
> face
> >it guys, there is nobody out there that knows everything about
everything,
> >and if there is someone that thinks they do, I guarantee there is someone
> >else out there that knows more than they do. Obviously if this guy is
lying
> >about his CCIE he should be exposed, and after reported it is up to Cisco
> to
> >deal with as they see fit.
> >
> >.02
> >
> >Tim
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Sam LI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Mark Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 6:41 AM
> >Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
> >
> >
> >Well, even some real one behave like this, i come across a few in the the
> >past
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:55 PM
> >Subject: Possible phony CCIE
> >
> >
> >> Greetings-
> >>
> >>
> >> I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a CCIE.
He
> >> even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it. At least I think it is
> the
> >> CCIE logo. It is a router symbol surrounded with laurels and has the
> words
> >> Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer circling it as well. After asking
> >this
> >> person a few questions, I became suspicious of his credentials due to
his
> >> apparent lack of knowledge of the fundamentals. (I never asked for his
> >CCIE
> >> number because I attempted verification only after I left the account).
I
> >> faxed a copy of the business card he gave me (homemade BTW) to someone
in
> >> the CCIE program at Cisco.  She told me the card is bogus and that she
> >would
> >> send the card to the Cisco lawyers. That was three months ago and this
> >> person is STILL working on site there. What do you people think I
should
> >do
> >> now? Send e-mail to the persons that are contracting him there? He is
> >> charging a very high bill rate. The people he is working don't have
> enough
> >> knowledge to confirm his credentials. Should I let this go? Isn't part
of
> >my
> >> cert agreement with Cisco to protect the logo? I feel that Cisco isn't
> >doing
> >> anything to protect us here.
> >>
> >> Mark Cohen
> >> CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
> >>
> >> _________________________________
> >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to